Schlagwort: fake

  • Fake cases — make sure yours is the real deal

    Fake cases — make sure yours is the real deal

    Reading Time: 4 minutes

    We’ve had some reports of people finding cases that pretend to be official Raspberry Pi products online — these are fakes, they’re violating our trademark, they’re not made very well, and they’re costing you and us money that would otherwise go to fund the Raspberry Pi Foundation’s charitable work. (Reminder, for those who are new to this stuff: we’re a not-for-profit, which means that every penny we makes goes to support our work in education, and that none of us gets to own a yacht.)

    Making sure your accessories are legit

    If you want to be certain that the Raspberry Pi accessories you buy are the real thing, make sure you’re purchasing from one of our Authorised Resellers: if you buy via our website, you’ll automatically be directed to the Authorised Resellers in your region. Lots of other vendors also sell the official case, so if you’re wondering whether yours is the real thing, we’ve found there are some easy ways to tell the difference.

    A wellwisher sent us one of the fake cases (elegantly photographed by Fiacre above), which we passed around the office with a great deal of wincing, imagining what you guys might say if you got your hands on one and thought we’d made it. They’re really not very nice; the moulding’s awful, the fit’s bad, the colour’s off, and we’d be embarrassed if we had made something like this ourselves.

    Asking the experts

    We thought we’d ask the good people at T-Zero, who did all the work on the tooling and injection moulding for the real case (which is a considerably harder job than we’d imagined at first — you can read about the very bumpy road we had before finding T-Zero, who are amazing partners, in this post from days of yore), why the fake cases look so hideous. Simon Oliver, Grand Poobah of Plastics, wrote back:

    Basically, what you are witnessing is very cheaply and quickly made tooling. The flash is just poor toolmaking. The rounded edges are due to the toolmaking method of milling everything, which is quick and cheap, but you can’t get definition of sharp corners because you have to have a radius in places. I have tried to explain it below, and you have to think in reverse for the tool.

    Milling artifacts

    Can you imagine how many electrodes are needed for the logo? The leaves around the top have to be laser-cut into an electrode to get the definition. See screen grabs of the tool and moulding — look how many sharp corners there are!

    CAD representations of logo and tool

    To properly make a tool for something this complicated, you need more electrodes than someone quickly copying a case like this would find economical. The official Raspberry Pi case needed 140 electrodes to produce the tool.

    Electrodes

    A few of the electrodes that went to make the injection moulding tool for the official case

    Reverse-engineering by digitising existing components in a CAD will also loose definition, particularly in sharp corners, as the moulding process will form a small radius even if the tool is a sharp corner.

    Plastic shrinks away from a 90 degree corner, leaving a smallish radius in any case. So your data from digitising will have a radius, and then [the producers] compound it by milling the lot.

    Finally, the colour is off! It took ages to get your Raspberry Pi red correct. A lot of suppliers can’t repeat it; the current supplier had five attempts!

    Thanks, Simon; and to everybody reading this, we hope it arms you with the confidence to make sure you’re buying a genuine product!

    FYI

    Before panic ensues, please note: we love third-party cases designed for Raspberry Pi. So much so that we sell a few of them in our store here in Cambridge.

    The internet is full of innovative cases you can purchase, as well as wonderful 3D-printable alternatives you can make yourself, and as long as they aren’t breaking any trademark rules — using our logo, copying the work of others, pretending to be official when they’re not — that’s great!

    If you’ve designed a case for any of the Raspberry Pi models, share it with us in the comments below, as we’d love to see your work. And if you see a case, or any other Raspberry Pi accessory, for sale that you think is breaking trademark rules or attempting to imitate our official products, please let us know.

    Website: LINK

  • BENTO WATCH – 世界最小の弁当「BENTO WATCH」。

    BENTO WATCH – 世界最小の弁当「BENTO WATCH」。

    Reading Time: < 1 minute

    [mbYTPlayer url=“https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cQXGc1nNPWk“ opacity=“.5″ quality=“medium“ ratio=“auto“ isinline=“false“ showcontrols=“false“ realfullscreen=“true“ printurl=“true“ autoplay=“true“ mute=“true“ loop=“true“ addraster=“true“ stopmovieonblur=“false“ gaTrack=“false“]

    taro_160316bento02

     

  • 5 Reasons Why People Think the Moon Landings Are a Hoax

    5 Reasons Why People Think the Moon Landings Are a Hoax

    Reading Time: 3 minutes

    The most notable claim is that the six manned landings (1969-1972) were faked and that the twelve Apollo astronauts did not walk on the Moon. Conspiracy theorists (henceforth conspiracists) base their claims on the notion that NASA and others knowingly misled the public into believing the landings happened by manufacturing, destroying, or tampering with evidence; including photos, telemetry tapes, transmissions, rock samples, and even some key witnesses.

    5. Strange Object in Reflection

    Immediately after photographs of the moon landings were released, conspiracy theorists were quick to note an unexplainable object inside the reflection of an Apollo 12 astronaut’s helmet. The object definitely seems to be hanging from a rope or wire and has no reason for being there by any means, leading several to suggest it truly is a spotlight typically used by film companies.

    4. Lack of Stars

    One particular compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack associated with stars in any of the photographic / video evidence. There are no clouds for the moon, so stars tend to be perpetually visible as well as significantly brighter than that which you see through the particular filter of Earth’s environment. The argument here is that NASA might have found it impossible to map out the locations of all stars for the hoax without becoming rumbled, and therefore eventually left them out.

    3. Cross Hairs

    The cameras as used during the moon landings had many cross-hairs to assist with scaling along with direction. These are imprinted outrageous of all images. Some of your images, however, clearly show your cross-hairs behind objects inside the scene, implying that photographs had been edited or doctored following being taken.

    2. Waving Flag

    The flag placed on the surface by the astronauts fluttered despite there being no wind on the Moon. This suggests that it was filmed on Earth and a breeze caused the flag to flutter. Sibrel said that it may have been caused by indoor fans used to cool the astronauts, since their spacesuit cooling systems would have been too heavy on Earth.

    1. Background

    There are identical backgrounds in photos which, according to their captions, were taken miles apart. This suggests that a painted background was used.
    Official Source: http://listverse.com/

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VhLSY5Kr7hA&feature=player_embedded#t=0

  • UK newspaper The Sun thinks Deus Ex is real

    UK newspaper The Sun thinks Deus Ex is real

    Reading Time: < 1 minute

    In a feature about future technologies, UK newspaper The Sun shows a picture of a cybernetic eyeball, saying that it is the kind of thing that will be commonplace with future generations.

    However, the eyeball is clearly labelled with the name of Sarif Industries, which -as you may know- is a fictitious company in the Deus Ex: Human Revolution game.

    3rpejavsy8

    Official Source: http://www.bitterwallet.com/the-sun-mistakes-company-from-video-game-as-real/69128

    http://www.destructoid.com/uk-newspaper-the-sun-thinks-deus-ex-is-real-263698.phtml?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter